Few Civil War history books convey another country’s perspective. Amanda Foreman has done history buffs a service by offering a British perspective on our great conflict. Along with fascinating details about spy operations in Canada, Foreman supplies information on French, Irish, and German participation as diplomats, soldiers, and observers. The book may not quite depict a world on fire, but it’s eye-opening to learn how much our civil war affected other nations.
A World on Fire's greatest contribution is its insight into the issue of British and French recognition of the Confederate States of America—arguably the war's most significant political battle. Abraham Lincoln ultimately thwarted Jefferson Davis in this contest, which many considered an easy Confederate win. Had recognition been granted, the South likely would have achieved independence.
A World on Fire is a dazzling research effort, with most of the narrative driven by personal letters, diaries, and official documents. However, too much of this research ended up in the book. For instance, the large tome sometimes takes a deep dive into a British person’s experience solely because the individual kept a good diary. While the perspective of a common soldier or low-level officer can be valuable and interesting, it feels out of place in a book about foreign perspectives on the war, since a soldier’s experience is similar regardless of nationality. Additionally, the book’s structure is disjointed, as characters reappear after long absences without reminders of who they were, making transitions feel unnatural.
Ultimately, A World on Fire offers a rare and comprehensive view of the American Civil War through the eyes of foreign observers, above all from Britain. Given the overwhelming number of Civil War books, this fresh approach is an impressive accomplishment in its own right.
Comments
Post a Comment