The 1850 Fugitive Slave Act

While researching Maelstrom, a follow-on novel to Tempest at Dawn, I dug into the details of the 1850 Fugitive Slave Act. Democrats pushed the bill through with a slim margin, and it was signed into law by Millard Fillmore.

Reaction in free states was swift and bitter. Protests erupted overnight in almost every northern population center, with many openly proclaiming that they would not obey an unconstitutional law. Slaveholders dismissed the protests as “mongrel gatherings.”

By itself, the Fugitive Slave Act did not cause the Civil War, but it tilted the slave issue in favor of the slaveholding states, enraged the North, and encouraged the South's overbearing behavior.

Here’s what the law required.

The federal government took away state authority to find, return, and try escaped slaves.
The bill established a body of commissioners to hear cases with no right of appeal to the legal system.
Commissioners were paid $5 when they found for the accused and $10 when they ordered the accused runaway returned to slavery.
U.S. Marshals could conscript citizens against their will to run down fugitive slaves.
Accused fugitive slaves were denied due process and habeas corpus, which overrode many state laws.
Those assisting a fleeing slave faced stiff penalties.
No statute of limitations.

Slaveholders and their Northern Democratic supporters admitted that the law was probably unconstitutional, but they had the Supreme Court in their pocket with Chief Justice Taney and a majority of the justices from slaveholding states. Seven years later, Taney would rule in Dred Scott v. John Sanford that African Americans were not and could not be citizens.

The repercussions of shoving the Compromise of 1850 down the throat of the nation? Abolitionists saw that some Whigs were in cahoots with Democrats and formed the Republican Party. A man with a lucrative law practice decided to return to politics. Ten years after the Act, the Republican Party nominated that man as its candidate for president, and Abraham Lincoln became the sixteenth president of the United States. At his Cooper Union Address, Lincoln accused Democrats of promising “to destroy the government, unless you are allowed to construe and enforce the constitution as you please, on all points in dispute between you and us. You will rule or ruin.”

Comments

Mail-In Ballots Anyone?

During the American Civil War, soldiers were allowed to vote by mail. This was the first instance of mail-in ballots in the nation's history. At the time, of course, only men had the right to vote. In the 1862 mid-year elections, many soldiers were given leave to return home to vote. It was detrimental to the war effort, so in 1864 the Union tried a new concept: mail-in ballots. Lincoln felt this was important to his reelection because a higher proportion of Republicans enlisted. On September 27, 1864, Ulysses S. Grant wrote to the Secretary of War Edwin Stanton: The exercise of the right of suffrage by the officers and soldiers of armies is a novel thing. A very large proportion of legal voters of the United States are now either under arms in the field, or in hospitals, or otherwise engaged in the military service of the United States … they are American citizens, having still their homes and social and political ties binding them to the States and districts from which they come...

A blog by James D. Best

A braham Lincoln is one of the most enigmatic presidents in American history. His law partner, William Herndon, described Lincoln as "the most shut-mouthed man who ever lived." Despite his constant pursuit of an audience, Lincoln rarely revealed his true thoughts. He often waffled, deflected questions, or told stories to avoid disclosing his plans. This tendency is one reason historians and critics can depict him as having seemingly contradictory opinions on various issues, conflicting motives, and a range of personal characteristics encompassing every imaginable human behavior. This blog will not attempt to resolve these contradictions. Instead, it will present them all to readers so they can draw their own conclusions. So, sit back, enjoy, and feel free to participate in the discussion. Additionally, this blog promotes Maelstrom , A Civil War Novel . Maelstrom tells the story of the greatest rivalry in American history. Praise for Maelstrom “I enjoyed this.” Harold Holzer...

Book Review: Mr. Lincoln’s High-Tech War by Thomas B. Allen & Rodger MacBride

Mr. Lincoln’s High-Tech War: How the North Used theTelegraph, Railroads, Surveillance Balloons, Ironclads, High-Powered Weapons,and More to Win the Civil War Thomas B. Allen & Rodger MacBride Long title and a bit of a misnomer because this book also deals with the use of technology by the Confederate States of America. Granted, the Confederacy was limited by its scarce industrial capability, but it focused what it had on its navy, including the first ironclad in combat and the first submarine. Both were effective when let out of the barn, but neither lasted much beyond their first engagement. That’s the way it goes with military innovation; failures often precede a workable design. Most people view the American Civil War as a series of bloody battles fought with muskets and cannons. It all looks so backward from a modern perspective. In truth, the American Civil War changed warfare dramatically through technological advances. Before the Civil War, Napoleon de...

Book Review: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin

Team of Rivals: The Political Genius of Abraham Lincoln Doris Kearns Goodwin Goodwin’s smooth style is reader-friendly. Team of Rivals , published in 2005, has become a standard in the crowded Lincoln genre, winning the Lincoln Prize and the Book Prize for American History. Team of Rivals was also a finalist for several other prizes. More than 18,000 books have been written about Abraham Lincoln, making him one of the most documented figures in history. To market a new perspective, many Lincoln scholars seek to offer a unique take on one of the most studied men in history. Goodwin, when not the narrator herself, allows Lincoln’s cabinet to tell his story. Every president since George Washington has governed with a cabinet, and the cabinet is often given short shrift by historians. Rightly so, in many cases. But Lincoln was different. He filled his cabinet and lesser positions with his Republican competitors, northern Democratic Party leaders, and other powerful rivals within...

Book Review: The Truth of the War Conspiracy of 1861 by H W Johnstone

The Truth of the War Conspiracy of 1861 A Reassessment of Why the American Civil War Began by H W Johnstone This booklet was published in 1921 by a Civil War veteran. The author’s intent is to advocate for The Lost Cause and expose the “truth.” I’ve read several modern-day defenses of The Lost Cause, but I wanted to get the perspective of someone closer in time to the conflict. A participant was even better, although Johnstone served for only an unexplained eight months. Unfortunately, time and participation provided few novel insights. I shouldn't have been surprised because years earlier, Jefferson Davis had articulated the dogma of The Lost Cause in his two histories of the Confederate States of America. Johnstone argues that a duplicitous President Lincoln started the war by reinforcing Forts Sumter and Pickens, the last Union military presence in the seceded states. First, the duplicitous part. In his inaugural, Lincoln said, “The power confided to me will be used to...

Abraham Lincoln: The Enigmatic President

Search This Blog